Hi folks, On 2013-01-22, at 9:51, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2013, at 5:30 AM, Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: > >>> [...] >> >> Maybe.. Here's the bigger issue, if I found issues/bugs in John's >> svn->git conversion, what do we do? (and yes, I found a problem in the >> conversion) >> >> [...] >> >> Personally, I feel that it's important to have the history "correct", >> even if it means resetting and invalidating the existing repos. > > [...] > > Yes, this is a good opportunity to fix the history. We can simply delete and > regenerate the Github repos. No problem, I had to do it a couple of times > when I did the original conversion. Everyone will then have to re-clone and > reattach any private branches. A PITA, but a one-time one. > [...] Let me play the devil's advocate here. The GitHub repos are Good Enough™ now because they work--and they have the benefit of being already published and in use (e.g. by me :-). We can always leave the SVN repo up as a read-only archive if people want to see the absolutely correct version of history. In fact as I understand it we're doing that anyway? So about what I said before: just tar & gzip up John's local git svn repos, unpack them and set up on your server. Should work. Regards, Yawar _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
