Yep, I get it now and I agree. It's a current bug that the matching does
not disregard transactions that have online-id.
On 5/7/20 8:56 AM, John Ralls wrote:
On May 6, 2020, at 9:46 PM, jeanl <rip...@gmail.com> wrote:
What about this question?
On a related note, is it expected that an already-cleared transactions
should appear in the list of matches, if the "Enable update match action"
option isn't on? It seems that it shouldn't but maybe I don't quite
understand the match logic...
Uh, what question?
IMO clearing/reconciling and download matching are somewhat orthogonal at least
for most OFX imports because of the FITID. When an import includes FITID fields
then all splits without an online-id are legitimate candidates for matching. In
the absence of FITID information I suppose that cleared or reconciled splits
might reasonably be rejected, but if we were to adopt a scoring system as Chris
suggests then perhaps being cleared or reconciled could be a score reduction
rather than an outright exclusion.
Regards,
John Ralls
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
