On Monday 01 September 2003 10:05 am, someone claiming to be Jon Lapham wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:I guess you mean within the docs themselves and not the webified docs...
As long as the reference uses the correct chapter/section whatever. Currently, the page says "You enter a transaction with multiple splits, which we will cover in section 4.3." Section 4.3 is "Choosing a Register Style",
I think we should definitely use the correct reference. :) In fact, I wish I knew how to put a link there, so you could just click and go immediately to the reference...
Ideally, both.
... to a virgin GnuCash user, aren't two account transactions multi-account transactions, multi being more than 1. The more I think about it, the more I like the use of just "Simple Transaction/Complex (Split) Transaction."
Ugh, "Multi" is bad. I see what you mean now.
Okay, I'm convinced. Let's go back to a modified version of your original idea:
Simple Transaction (2 accounts) Split Transaction (3 or more accounts)
...this has the advantage that we always use the familiar GnuCash terminology (split transaction) but it is clear to a new user what we mean b/c we explicitly state (2 accounts) and (3 or more accounts).
Sound good?
-- -**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*--- Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Work: Extracta Mol�culas Naturais SA http://www.extracta.com.br/ Web: http://www.jandr.org/ ***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
