So...
Are we back to Simple Transaction
Complex (Split) Transaction
and just leaving off any reference to the number of accounts involved?
Ahhhhhh...... kerplung. (or, whatever the sound is of someone jumping from a tall bridge into the river below).
:)
"3 or more accounts" refers to the number of accounts involved in the transaction, I do not see how this requires that they are different accounts. I think we are still fine.
There are always better ways to describe things, but often that requires longer explanations. At some point we have to put a title on the section and move on, we can be *very* clear what we mean in the body text. Another complication, for example, is that you can enter a "split transaction" with only 2 accounts, so is it wrong to not mention this in the title of the simple transaction?
So, let's vote on the following two proposals for the section titles:
Simple Transaction (2 accounts) Split Transaction (3 or more accounts)
or
Simple Transaction Which May or May Not Involve the Split Transaction Mechanism but Must Only Involve 2 Accounts
Transaction Involving More that Two Accounts In Which May or May Not be Different Accounts but Will Always Involve the Split Transaction Mechanism
-- -**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*--- Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Work: Extracta Mol�culas Naturais SA http://www.extracta.com.br/ Web: http://www.jandr.org/ ***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
