Em dom, 25 de nov de 2018 às 21:26, John Ralls < jra...@ceridwen.fremont.ca.us> escreveu:
> Meh. The word “split” may not be in your accounting textbook, but the > concept of it is. Every transaction requires an entry in each of at least > two account ledgers (hence “double entry”). GnuCash calls those entries > “splits”. You can argue about the name if you want, but the concept is the > foundation of formal accounting. > > Regards, > John Ralls > I see you're attentive and will not let me talk bullshit! Out of GnuCash, in double-entry accounting in a transaction of two accounts, if you look at one side you will see for example 10 and if you look at the other side you will see 10, there is nothing splitted but rather balanced. GnuCash has appropriated, modified and expanded the concept of the *split *word, so within GnuCash it has been "split" that may have the same concept of left side and right side, top line, bottom line, and also the same concept that accounts, yes, now belongs to accounting. When the concept of "split" is left side and right side, top line, bottom line I'm right, when the concept is accounts, you're right. -- Regards GTI _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
