-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Saturday 17 December 2011 at 3:25:56 PM, in
<mid:4eecb484.6080...@jeromebaum.com>, Jerome Baum wrote:


> I doubt the validity of those automated checks and
> checks on the email anyway. What constitutes "owning"
> f...@example.com?

As far as that server's checking is concerned, being able to receive
the email they send out to that address and respond to it or click a
link.


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:expires2...@ymail.com

Is it possible to be a closet claustrophobic?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQCVAwUBTuy9o6ipC46tDG5pAQr6OgQAuI5T26SVlJGQrQx5QtjqjCMPbcGKKnYR
nbafgCX0CeYxHY6IVv0qw/67qt+dUdbdDdjHmJnn5LT0yqFSf7+sMG1PyBtbGTEk
8y/LeiNOfRkn26+4Fj/BdWoy4v07KW0iNj8ywYpp3EvHBi3vuInrOrVhDXwHD94w
8KFB84qIYvM=
=GfRL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to