On Dec 17, 2011, at 8:23 AM, gn...@lists.grepular.com wrote:

> On 16/12/11 19:07, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
> 
>> What if keyservers were to limit the amount of keys generated or 
>> uploaded to a 'reasonable' amount which no 'real' user would 
>> exceed?
>> 
>> (i.e. 10/day, or some other number discussed and agreed upon by the 
>> various keyservers?)
> 
> You could still successfully mess with someone by signing their key with
> offensive or spammy content ten times a day.
> 
> I find it strange that the keyservers don't do any sort of email
> validation before accepting key submissions and that they just allow
> anyone to upload signatures for your key without verifying if you want
> to allow them first.

There is such a keyserver, made by the PGP company (now run by Symantec, I 
suppose): http://keyserver.pgp.com/

It's an interesting server, with different semantics than the traditional 
keyserver net that we were talking about earlier.  Most significantly, it 
emails the keyholder (at the address on the key) before accepting the key into 
the server.  It also signs keys that are submitted to it, which allows people 
to leverage this email checking in their own trust calculations, but can also 
"litter" keys with repeated signatures.  If I recall, it is (or perhaps was) 
the default keyserver for PGP installations.

Of necessity, this server does not synchronize with other keyservers, which is 
either a good or bad thing, depending on who you ask ;)

David


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to