On 2011-12-17 14:58, gn...@lists.grepular.com wrote: > So you agree that there is a point where putting security measures in > place is a good idea. Where you disagree with me, is you think it is > unlikely that the keyservers will be abused in this manner in the near > future. > > I guess neither of us can see into the future, but the prevalence of > this sort of abuse on the Internet, always places me on the side of caution.
Yes this is definitely a subjective matter. >> I would be very happy to see this become a problem in fact. It would >> imply that OpenPGP is popular enough to attract script kiddies & co. > > It would only take one troll. Sure. How many trolls do you see on gnupg-users? -- PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA -- nameserver 217.79.186.148 nameserver 178.63.26.172 http://opennicproject.org/ -- No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
