> Certainly there are many reasons to extend the standard, which is not > set in stone and which is not a politically adopted law, for meaningful > things.
Yes. If you want to talk about changing the standard please bring it up to the proper mailing list. Here is not the place for it. If you can persuade people to change the standard I'll be wildly in favor of GnuPG implementing the standard. > Of course, a program author has the right to design his program as he > sees fit, but please don't be surprised if far-sighted pioneers expand > this standard to meet the needs of a user base who would also like to > use this standard. This is irrelevant. We're talking about what GnuPG should do if someone specifies strict RFC conformance. The answer to that question is simple: it should strictly conform to the RFC and treat UID-free certificates as the malformed entities they are.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users