Hi Stefan, On 17/01/2021 19.41, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > Please try to accept that GitHub (and maybe in the future others as well) > has *no* bad certificate! The only thing which could be considered "bad" > or at least sub-optimal for a global ML, like this one, Is the support in > form of the GnuPGP ecosystem devs.
GitHub's web server, *in your specific use case* is sending a certificate proving it is an apple when you're asking for it under the name "orange". That makes the certificate *invalid* for that connection request as it could not be distinguished from a man in the middle attack asking your browser to "Please try to accept that this apple is an orange". Don't you find it strange that you are the only one still insisting that it's valid when several very knowledgeable people have explained to you in many different ways why it's simply not true? And please tone down on the GnuPG criticism. It's your right to dislike the software or even Werner Koch personally. But this is not the right place for anti-publicity or constant personal stabs against people who have patiently spent a lot of time to help and educate you. Please try to keep the discussion productive. Kind regards André -- Greetings... From: André Colomb <an...@colomb.de>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
