On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 9:40 PM Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote: > > I can only agree with Andre's words.
Perfectly fine for me if you take this route. > And as far as Sequoia is concerned, Stefen's explanations only confirmed > that this is software that I definitely don't want to use. You don't have to, because we live in a free world. > Software that accepts an invalid digital certificate as correct, has no > place in an environment where security and confidentiality are concerned. > This is an a b s o l u t e NO-GO. You talking nonsense while not knowing! > GnuPG doesn't have to change anything here. > The change MUST be made at Sequoia, preferably yesterday! Utterly nonsense, IMHO. sequoia-pgp, Mailvelope (supported by BSI and *audited*) and flowcrypt do all work with github.io pages! And you were not able to reply to me here if your WKD set-up for dummies worked for you. So much for that part... Regards Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
