On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:16 PM Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote:
Hi Juergen. > Your showcase with github.io also says nothing else than that Sequoia > considers an invalid certificate to be correct. That this happens in > audited software says just as much about the value of the audit. Please try to accept that GitHub's SSL cert is *valid*, or do you think that a CA certifies and invalid cert? Regarding the other aruments you have made, don't you think if a fruitful solution from all involved devs are a good idea if it gives WKD users, the greatest flexibility? Peace and best regards Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
