On Oct 5, 2006, at 12:45, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006, at 12:46, David Ayers wrote:
I'm almost indifferent on the subject. But in practice I believe
people
will unknowingly break binary compatibility and forget to bump the SO
name. I think this is worse than forcing folks to recompile apps
just
because the SO name bumped even though it didn't break binary
compatibility.... but like I said. I wouldn't mind either way.
That worries me too ... but I think we *must* try to be strict
about it.
I don't think it will work to enforce being strict about this on all
developers (same for other non-hack stuff, like documentation). Its
too much work and slows down development because you can't
concentrate on the actual thing you want to do.
So in my model we would just bump the soname before/after each alpha
release. Or possibly even keep it the same because it has little
practical value for alpha anyways, no special preferences here.
Writing an automated testsuite (which would also need to be
maintained) is IMHO a waste of efforts.
Greets,
Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
