On Jan 23, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Nicola Pero wrote:
Ok ... thanks. I suppose for gnustep-make I can do all the steps
up to tagging
the release, then you or Gregory will send out announces and manage
the release
publishing ?
Sure, that's fine.
But since 1.13.0 we have dropped the library suffixes and changed
the ./obj directories ... if you have stuff compiled with 1.13.0 on
your machine when you install the new gnustep-make you might need
to recompile everything. :-)
That seems to deserve at least bumping up the minor number to
1.14.0! ;-)
Definitely. 1.14 is the current (unreleased) unstable version of base
so it should at least be bumped to that.
I always like to at least keep these two packages in sync with
release numbers as well. The only issue is that the current policy
states that 'stable' release have an even sub-minor version number,
but perhaps we could just clean that up with the next stable/unstable
release (or change the policy).
PS: When we complete the Linux/general FHS support (which is not
far, I'm getting there, a last big effort [involving also gnustep-
base] and it will be done) I'd like to bump the gnustep-make
version number straight up to 2.0.0. Which will be deserved
because of the massive psychological/practical impact of the
change. ;-)
That sounds grand. Advertising that GNUstep now automatically
integrates with standard systems might make people take notice...
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev