On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:51:01 +0100, Riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, > On 2008-03-02 00:18:47 +0100 Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's time for another release. I'll make an unstable release of the core >> libraries late next week. I also plan a stable base release, but I >> will not make a stable release of the gui libraries, unless there is >> some important patch the someone wants there (or better yet, patch >> the stable branch yourself so I don't have to do it). > I know of no blocking issues, I should probably give a compile test on > gcc 2.95 in the next days, just to be sure. About stable, since I > gather Debian tracks stable (?) it would be nice to have some of the > printing stuff backported to stable: PRICE doesn't compile against > current debian packages. But it is just my guess: htey have an > reasonably up to date base, but a horrid old gui and I thought it was > that they track stable. Yes, Debian currently tracks the stable branch. My understanding was that the purpose for stable was to provide a stable ABI for application developers to target. But I'm hearing more about applications that need the unstable branch to compile. (PRICE, and simpleagenda.app, at least.) So, is it better to track stable or unstable at this point? Hubert (with his Debian Developer hat on) -- Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
