On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Gregory Casamento <greg.casame...@gmail.com> wrote: > If the consensus is to move to github, then that work is basically already > done. The github mirror is a full mirror of all of the code in subversion. > I agree with David. Where we are hosted is extremely important since it has > everything to do with visibility. > > The only problem I am seeing with moving is that we may lose some existing > contributors or, at least, piss off some existing contributors if we do make > a move to github. Additionally, as one might predict, the FSF doesn't like > github. So a move to github not only amounts to a move of repos, but I'm > afraid it's also the equivalent of a fork which is not something I'm opposed > to talking about.
I tend to side with the FSF in this regard, so I'd prefer something like gitlab which provides hosting, as well as a free software license to the software they use to host... similarly it might not be a bad idea to provide a dns alias to e.g. git.gnustep.org to whomever is chosen to host, though I suppose encryption complicates the matter... _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
