David, On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:20 AM David Chisnall <thera...@sucs.org> wrote:
> On 29 May 2015, at 09:55, Gregory Casamento <greg.casame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > If the consensus is to move to github, then that work is basically > already done. The github mirror is a full mirror of all of the code in > subversion. I agree with David. Where we are hosted is extremely > important since it has everything to do with visibility. > > I don’t quite agree here. git svn does a reasonable job, with the goal of > making it easy to use git to push back into an upstream svn repo. For the > git repo here (which I hope to have time to move back to > github.com/gnustep/libobjc2 this weekend): > > https://github.com/davidchisnall/libobjc2 > > I used svn2git, which allows better control over how things are mapped to > branches and tags. This version preserves the structure of the svn repo > better and we’d probably want to do something similar for other GNUstep > projects, making sure that branches in svn become git branches and tags in > svn become git tags. > I see what you mean. I didn't use svn2git, I should look into doing that. We’d probably also want to replicate some of the structure of svn with git > externals so that people who wanted to would be able to do a single clone > and get everything. This is generally the way that atomic commits are > achieved between git repos. > Understandable. > David > GC
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
