FSF has its principles, and I understand them. But this is not really a problem for a DVCS, right?
- Official repo can be in a FSF-approved place. Pushes happen to over there. - Mirror can be on Github. - Pull requests can be manually imported from Github into the FSF-approved place. - I would not attempt to automate sync from Github onto the other place, just from the other place onto Github. With full automation, I predict race conditions, as well as unnecessary (and occasionally failing) merges. - We can swap roles of Github and 'the other place' as necessary, the adjustment of config files per-developer is minimal. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Gregory Casamento < greg.casame...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe that github is the best of both worlds as it provides the people > who like subversion a way to keep working with it and those who want to > work with git a way to do so. > > We could even provide a mirror back to gna. The only consideration is that > the FSF doesn't like github because it's nonfree. This is NOT a position I > agree with. > > GC. > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 18:06 Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:01 PM Riccardo Mottola < >> riccardo.mott...@libero.it> wrote: >> >>> Ivan Vučica wrote: >>> > Are we moving to Git any time soon? >>> >>> I hope not? >>> >> >> I have a contrary opinion, especially considering this: >> https://help.github.com/articles/support-for-subversion-clients/ >> >
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
