This is basically an extension of what I'm already doing on github. I would rather the project live at github than any other place since it opens it up to more exposure.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 18:29 Ivan Vučica <[email protected]> wrote: > FSF has its principles, and I understand them. But this is not really a > problem for a DVCS, right? > > - Official repo can be in a FSF-approved place. Pushes happen to over > there. > - Mirror can be on Github. > - Pull requests can be manually imported from Github into the FSF-approved > place. > - I would not attempt to automate sync from Github onto the other place, > just from the other place onto Github. With full automation, I predict race > conditions, as well as unnecessary (and occasionally failing) merges. > - We can swap roles of Github and 'the other place' as necessary, the > adjustment of config files per-developer is minimal. > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Gregory Casamento < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I believe that github is the best of both worlds as it provides the >> people who like subversion a way to keep working with it and those who want >> to work with git a way to do so. >> >> We could even provide a mirror back to gna. The only consideration is >> that the FSF doesn't like github because it's nonfree. This is NOT a >> position I agree with. >> >> GC. >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 18:06 Ivan Vučica <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:01 PM Riccardo Mottola < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Ivan Vučica wrote: >>>> > Are we moving to Git any time soon? >>>> >>>> I hope not? >>>> >>> >>> I have a contrary opinion, especially considering this: >>> https://help.github.com/articles/support-for-subversion-clients/ >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
