SourceTree and most other GUI tools don't depend on a particular site.
Last time I used SourceTree (2013? 2014?) it had some integration with
Bitbucket for creation of repos, but that's not interesting for gnustep's use
case anyway.
On February 4, 2017 8:24:23 PM GMT+01:00, Richard Frith-Macdonald
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 3 Feb 2017, at 21:45, Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I must have missed something. Why GitHub as the main
>repository? We had a very similar discussion before, but without the
>time pressure and there, as far as I remember, we all agreed to move to
>git on Savannah, plus a mirror on GitHub and some SVN access to that.
>
>Allow me to change my mind ... I've had a few years using git now,
>enough to have a properly informed opinion:
>It's trendy and is good for huge projects, but for a small project like
>GNUstep is overly complex and hard to understand/use relatavie to
>subversion so, to gain any benefit. we need to have it as easy to use
>as possible. That means hosting it on a popular site where the best
>GUI tools (eg SourceTree, though I'm sure people like lots of other
>tools) work seamlessly. Unfortunately Savannah just isn't integrated
>with the best new tools/systems.
>So, while I'd really prefer to use Savannah as a free software hosting
>site, I now believe it would be a poor option if we hope to encourage
>new users/contributors; moving to git on Savannah would put an
>obstacle in the way of contributors.
>I think we'd want a github master, rgularly copied to savannah so we
>have a presence there, or possibly a dual-master system (though it's
>not clear to me that git really supports dual master).
>_______________________________________________
>Gnustep-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
