I ask that the industry consider whether or not SciHub activities could
possibly be the work of one individual residing in Russia, or whether there
is something more malicious taking place instead.

 

I am not a conspiracy theorist, but it makes sense to me (and I have not
heard any serious argument otherwise) in light of recent Russian attempts to
alter the course of the US election (and others), that if Russia really
wanted to get into the computers of every research lab and academic
institution around the world, there would be no better way to do it than to
give away free research articles. Please think about this… a cover for a
phishing exercise targeting every atomic energy facility, WHO-sponsored lab,
CDC facilities, government and state labs around the world, leading academic
institutions housing the world’s cutting edge intellectual property, etc. 

 

The computing and article collating power that this single person would need
to have at her disposal to be able to have the IP change every 10 minutes
(as I understand it), archive and mirror the collections, etc. may not be
the resources and activities of a single person. We need to consider this
possibility in this new world we live in, and also consider the consequences
of not taking steps to shut down such potentially corrupt intent, if in fact
such intent is ongoing.

 

Donald Samulack

(Speaking as a concerned citizen)

 

 

From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Heather Morrison
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 1:08 PM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: Re: [GOAL] Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific
publishing bad for science?

 

Indeed, great article. Building on this, a reflection: whatever one thinks
of the ethics and legality of Elsevier's lawsuit against SciHub founder
Alexandra Elbakyan, it appears to me that she has demonstrated that a
Kazhakstani graduate student can provide the bulk of the important services
contributed by Elsevier (hosting and serving up articles) at no cost to
users, and apparently off the side of her desk. If this is correct, this
says something about the real necessary marginal cost for providing this
service, i.e. almost nothing.

 

Considering that academics do the real work of academic publishing - writing
and peer review - if the traditional value add of publishers in storing and
disseminating articles, necessary in the print and early electronic ages,
can now be done for next to nothing, surely we can devise a new system that
retains or strengthens quality at a fraction of the cost?

 

best,

 

-- 
Dr. Heather Morrison
Associate Professor
École des sciences de l'information / School of Information Studies
University of Ottawa

Desmarais 111-02

613-562-5800 ext. 7634

Sustaining the Knowledge Commons: Open Access Scholarship

http://sustainingknowledgecommons.org/
http://www.sis.uottawa.ca/faculty/hmorrison.html
heather.morri...@uottawa.ca

 

On 2017-06-27, at 11:38 AM, "Reckling, Falk" <falk.reckl...@fwf.ac.at>

 wrote:





Indeed Eric, astonishingbackground story, almost all what you have to know
about the publishing industry and very well written,



Best Falk



Von: Éric Archambault<mailto:eric.archamba...@science-metrix.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juni 2017 09:26
An: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)<mailto:goal@eprints.org>
Betreff: [GOAL] Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific
publishing bad for science?



Interesting article in the Guardian that spells out the role played by
Robert Maxwell in the development of the scholarly journal industry.

Éric


Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for
science?
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientif
ic-publishing-bad-for-science?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


Eric Archambault
1science.com
Science-Metrix.com
+1-514-495-6505 x111

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to