goal
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Thomas J. Walker
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Stevan Harnad
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Arthur Smith
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Marvin Margoshes
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Stevan Harnad
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Thomas J. Walker
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Arthur Smith
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Thomas J. Walker
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Stevan Harnad
Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K
Steve Hitchcock
Alternative publishing models - was: Scholar's Forum: A New Model...
J.W.T.Smith
Re: Alternative publishing models - was: Scholar's Forum: A New Model...
Stevan Harnad
Re: Alternative publishing models - was: Scholar's Forum: A New Model...
Arthur Smith
Re: Alternative publishing models - was: Scholar's Forum: A New Model...
Stevan Harnad
Re: Alternative publishing models - was: Scholar's Forum: A New Model...
Arthur Smith
Re: Alternative publishing models - was: Scholar's Forum: A New Model...
Stevan Harnad
The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Stevan Harnad
Re: The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Marvin Margoshes
Re: The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Stevan Harnad
Re: The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Steve Hitchcock <sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <har...@cogsci.soton.ac.uk>
Re: The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Stevan Harnad
Re: The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Paul M. Gherman
Re: The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Peter B. Boyce
Re: The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Paul M. Gherman
Re: The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Robert Terry
Re: The Logic of Page Charges to Free the Journal Literature
Sally Morris (ALPSP)
Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Ransdell, Joseph M.
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Ransdell, Joseph M.
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Professor L.W. Hurtado
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Ransdell, Joseph M.
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Professor L.W. Hurtado
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Marvin Margoshes
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Steve Hitchcock
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Ransdell, Joseph M.
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Ransdell, Joseph M.
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Re: Scholar's Forum: A New Model For Scholarly Communication
Stevan Harnad
Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature
Stevan Harnad
Re: Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature
Stevan Harnad
Re: Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature
Stevan Harnad
Re: Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature
Stevan Harnad
Re: Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature
Donald King
Re: Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature
Stevan Harnad
Re: Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature
Prof. Tom Wilson
Re: Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature
Stevan Harnad
Re: Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature
Prof. Tom Wilson
Author Self-Policing: Quis Custodiet?...
Stevan Harnad
Re: Author Self-Policing: Quis Custodiet?...
Stevan Harnad
Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Alexandre Soares
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Bruce Edmonds
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Stevan Harnad
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Bruce Edmonds
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Stevan Harnad
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Bruce Edmonds
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Stevan Harnad
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Donald F . Klein
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Bruce Edmonds
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Bruce Edmonds
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Stevan Harnad
Re: Independent scientific publication - Why have journals at all?
Marvin Margoshes
Forum for problems of extending application of xxx?
ransdell, joseph m.
Nature [online] November 5 on Peer Review
Stevan Harnad
Continuing the discussion
Bruce Edmonds
Re: Continuing the discussion
Tony Berry <to...@netinfo.com.au>
Re: Continuing the discussion
Stevan Harnad
Re: Continuing the discussion
Don H. Hunter, Jr.
Serials Review Interview
Stevan Harnad
Re: Serials Review Interview
Thomas Krichel <t.kric...@surrey.ac.uk>
Re: Serials Review Interview
Mark Doyle
Re: Serials Review Interview
Thomas Krichel
Re: Serials Review Interview
Mark Doyle
Re: Serials Review Interview
Thomas Krichel
Re: Serials Review Interview
Joseph M. Ransdell <ransd...@door.net>
Re: Serials Review Interview
Stevan Harnad
Re: Serials Review Interview
ransdell, joseph m.
Re: Serials Review Interview
Stevan Harnad
Re: Serials Review Interview
ransdell, joseph m.
Re: Serials Review Interview
Paul Ginsparg <ginsp...@qfwfq.lanl.gov>
Is The Feel of Paper Immortal?
Selmer Bringsjord
Re: Is The Feel of Paper Immortal?
Jim Till
Re: Is The Feel of Paper Immortal?
Stevan Harnad
Re: Is The Feel of Paper Immortal?
Jim Till
Re: Is The Feel of Paper Immortal?
Selmer Bringsjord
New Journal of Physics
Ken Rouse
End-of-98 thoughts
Marvin Margoshes
Re: End-of-98 thoughts
Stevan Harnad
Re: End-of-98 thoughts
John Grohol PsyD
Re: End-of-98 thoughts
Paul Ginsparg 505-667-7353
Re: Elsevier Science Policy on Public Web Archiving Needs Re-Thinking
Tony Barry <to...@netinfo.com.au>
Re: Elsevier Science Policy on Public Web Archiving Needs Re-Thinking
Patrick Wilken <patri...@cs.monash.edu.au>
Re: Elsevier Science Policy on Public Web Archiving Needs Re-Thinking
Arthur Smith <apsm...@aps.org>
Re: Elsevier Science Policy on Public Web Archiving Needs Re-Thinking
Stevan Harnad
Re: Elsevier Science Policy on Public Web Archiving Needs Re-Thinking
Albert Henderson <noblestat...@compuserve.com>
Re: Elsevier Science Policy on Public Web Archiving Needs Re-Thinking
Arthur Smith <apsm...@aps.org>
Re: Elsevier Science Policy on Public Web Archiving Needs Re-Thinking
Rosalind Reid <r...@amsci.org>
Re: Elsevier Science Policy on Public Web Archiving Needs Re-Thinking
Marvin Margoshes <physc...@earthlink.net>
Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals
Greg Youngen <gyoun...@physics.uiuc.edu>
Re: Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals
Greg Youngen <gyoun...@physics.uiuc.edu>
Re: Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals
Mark Doyle <do...@aps.org>
Re: Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals
Stevan Harnad
Re: Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals
Sally Morris
Re: Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals
Jim Till
Re: Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals
David Goodman
Re: Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals
Greg Kuperberg
Re: Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals
Thomas Krichel
Elsevier Science Policy on Public Web Archiving Needs Re-Thinking
Stevan Harnad
S/SL/PPV's Trojan Horse
Marvin Margoshes <physc...@earthlink.net>
Re: S/SL/PPV's Trojan Horse
Marvin Margoshes <physc...@earthlink.net>
Re: S/SL/PPV's Trojan Horse
Marvin Margoshes <physc...@earthlink.net>
Chron. High. Ed. 18 September on Cal Tech & Copyright
Joe Kraus <jokr...@du.edu>
Re: Chron. High. Ed. 18 September on Cal Tech & Copyright
Joseph Ransdell <bn...@ttu.edu>
Re: Chron. High. Ed. 18 September on Cal Tech & Copyright
Stevan Harnad
Re: Chron. High. Ed. 18 September on Cal Tech & Copyright
Stevan Harnad
Re: Chron. High. Ed. 18 September on Cal Tech & Copyright
Stevan Harnad
Re: Chron. High. Ed. 18 September on Cal Tech & Copyright
ransdell, joseph m.
Re: Chron. High. Ed. 18 September on Cal Tech & Copyright
Stevan Harnad
Re: Chron. High. Ed. 18 September on Cal Tech & Copyright
Steve Koonin <koo...@cco.caltech.edu>
Re: Chron. High. Ed. 18 September on Cal Tech & Copyright
Joseph Ransdell <bn...@ttu.edu>
Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Stevan Harnad
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
John Unsworth <jm...@virginia.edu>
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Stevan Harnad
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Arthur Smith
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Stevan Harnad
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Albert Henderson <noblestat...@compuserve.com>
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Stevan Harnad
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Mark Doyle
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Albert Henderson <noblestat...@compuserve.com>
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Stevan Harnad
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Mark Doyle
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Albert Henderson
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Albert Henderson
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Albert Henderson <noblestat...@compuserve.com>
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Stevan Harnad
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Tony Barry <to...@netinfo.com.au >
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Mark Doyle
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Albert Henderson <noblestat...@compuserve.com>
Re: Nature 10 September on Public Archiving
Mark Doyle
Science 4 September on Copyright
Arthur Smith <apsm...@aps.org>
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Marvin Margoshes <physc...@earthlink.net>
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Thomas J. Walker
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Irwin D. Bross <idbr...@worldnet.att.net>
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Stevan Harnad
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Martin Blume <bl...@bnl.gov>
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Henry Rzepa
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Tony Barry
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Albert Henderson <70244.1...@compuserve.com>
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Arthur Smith
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Stevan Harnad
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Albert Henderson <noblestat...@compuserve.com>
Re: Science 4 September on Copyright
Albert Henderson <noblestat...@compuserve.com>
The Urgent Need to Plan a Stable Transition
Stevan Harnad
Re: The Urgent Need to Plan a Stable Transition
Stevan Harnad
Re: The Urgent Need to Plan a Stable Transition
Arthur Smith
Re: The Urgent Need to Plan a Stable Transition
Stevan Harnad
Re: The Urgent Need to Plan a Stable Transition
Arthur Smith
Re: The Urgent Need to Plan a Stable Transition
Mark Doyle
The Grey Literature
Tony Barry <to...@netinfo.com.au>
PDF vs Markup Languages
Clinton Jones
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Rosalind Reid
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Clinton Jones
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Tony Barry
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Murray Turoff <tur...@concentric.net>
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Clinton Jones
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Arthur Smith
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Peter Murray-Rust
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Tony Barry
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
ingmar
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Selmer Bringsjord
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Arthur Smith
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Tony Barry
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Mark Doyle
Re: PDF vs Markup Languages
Selmer Bringsjord
Follow the AmSci discussion on the Web
Stevan Harnad
Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Vivienne Monty
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Thomas J. Walker
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Thomas J. Walker
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Arthur Smith
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Professor L.W. Hurtado
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Vivienne Monty
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Mark Doyle
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Thomas J. Walker
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Tony Barry <to...@netinfo.com.au>
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Stephen R. Heller
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Tony Barry
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Tony Barry
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Guedon Jean-Claude
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Guedon Jean-Claude
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Marvin Margoshes <physc...@earthlink.net>
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Thomas J. Walker
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Thomas J. Walker
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Stevan Harnad
Re: Should Publishers Offer Free-Access Services?
Thomas J. Walker
Earlier messages
Later messages