On Tue, 11/4/14, Jose Colaco wrote: FINAL RESPONSE from me to Mervyn Lobo on this matter - until something totally new comes up. Missing is mention of The (EDD) Expected Date of Delivery OR a medical note from the young lady's obstetrician. Once you read the relevant statute, I am sure you will agree with me....or May be not! ------------------------------------------------------
jc, I am not sure why you need to bar yourself - and also leave a clause open so that you can re-enter. Anyways, this case is about tomorrow, not 1961. Something totally new will definitely come up so you will have ample opportunity, time and again, to opine us on this matter. To reply to your point though, the Herald does (or does not) have the expected date of delivery. Either way, it chooses to keep mum. Its employee chose - to leave. Secondly, I have no desire to agree or disagree with anyone. I am quite satisfied with pointing out what I see. Lastly, I am look forward to your sprightly return to this mater :-) Mervyn
