Hi Eddie! I agree that you'd like to know from Argham's mouth, or from Archie. Most people have a cursory understanding of the esoteric as also the exoteric - very much, ideas that are common constructs.
But it appears you are keen on massaging your mind, and in that regard there is online support, which I am sure you would have found, or did, but it helps to engage I guess directly* - I tap into, to pick or reject options. *as in participatory design. Consider: https://www.godswordforyou.com/bible-studies/the-gospel-of-john/425-study-1.html I am not guaranteeing its proof-Catholic, but it is catholic in framing. Btw, lest my slip be showing; I appreciate Jeremiah 6:16, which surely has helped massage my mind, to the extent a lone ranger may expect. Thus saith the Lord: Stand ye on the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, which is the good way, and walk ye in it: and you shall find refreshment for your souls. And they said: We will not walk. So, rock on. Although illustrating for Philosophy Now, based in the UK, on quite heavy shit - I am no Bertrand Russell :) https://users.drew.edu/~jlenz/whynot.html * "*Bertrand Russell, *Why I Am Not a Christian*, Watts & Co., for the Rationalist Press Association Limited, 1927 First published as a pamphlet and reissued many times since then Why I am not a christian, share for all simply for his logic and articulation! " Venantius J Pinto <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:17 AM Eddie D'Sa <edsa0...@outlook.com> wrote: > Mr Argham continues to regale and confuse us with gems from his Bible, the > alleged inspired word of the Christian God. > Here are his recent quotes from John 1:1-4 & 14: > > 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word > was God. > 2 He was in the beginning with God. > 3 All things came to be through him, and without him nothing came to be. > 4. What came to be through him was life, and this life was the light of > the human race; > 14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us,... > =============== > It reads like a lot of garbage and Mr Argham does not elucidate. When a > message is posted, it is meant to educate, enlighten, edify. > But Mr Argham does not explain. Perhaps as a traditional Goan, he fears to > offend the Euro clerics who composed & authorised the text. > So what to do? He could ask a knowledgeable person, perhaps a senior local > cleric. How about Goa’s good Bishop? Will he engage with mere laymen? > > More than once, I had tried to elicit some comment and had copied a post > to the Bishop. HE never responded. > May be he fears he cannot offer his own views without consulting the > Vatican. > I am trying again. > > So dear Archbishop (or your assistant), could you kindly explain the four > above verses? > > Eddie > > > Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > >