Sachin, I googled Hussain and the painting of Sita riding on Hanuman's tail. Not only did I find that particular painting but also the one of Parvati sitting on Ganesha's head. Both these Godesses are nude, as I said before it is obnoxious, there is no art here but vulgarity.
Warm wishes, Sonia Gomes --- Sachin Phadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > VM writes: "Few in the ragged mob of Husain-bashing > extremists have actually seen the paintings they are > so eager to burn. To pick just one example from a > very recent post on Goanet, there is no Husain > painting of "nude sita in a sexually explicit pose > with hanuman." " > > I do not know on what basis does VM say this. I have > seen the objectionable paitings of Husain, and one > of them in indeed a nude Sita in a sexually explicit > poste with Hanuman. So far we have had arguments > like artistic freedom, an eminent artist, etc. Now > the goal is again shifted. This is the best way to > get a Hindu like me to be a supporter of radical > organisations. > > Incidentally, Sonia Gomes also claims to have seen > the painting I am referring to. Her words are: "I > once saw a painting of a Hindu Goddess painted by > Hussain ( I do not know which goddess it was ) > riding on Hanuman's tail." Of course, she does not > say that the goddess was nude or a sexually explicit > manner. But I am sure that if she saw it again, she > would use these words. > > VM also says: "Husain has a huge number of paintings > in a very long, improbable and distinguished > career." The protest is against some of his > paintings and not against all of them. > > Sachin Phadte > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Post ads for free - to sell, rent or even > buy.www.yello.in > http://ss1.richmedia.in/recurl.asp?pid=186 Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. To know how, go to http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html