Jonas Karlsson wrote: ...snip...
> Having commented the patches, I also would like to comment the idea. I > really like the idea and think it would be a great solution. However, > I think we really would make a misstake if we abandomed our > /System/Links/Executables, /System/Links/Libraries etc. I don't mean > we should keep /System/Links, just that 'Executables' and 'Libraries' > is much more clear than 'bin' and 'lib' (refer to, for example, change > of 'Store' to 'PackedRecipes', which is a somewhat big change imo, but > to ease readability). If we still would keep our long names, which > actually is a selling point, I think we would reach almost an optimal > solution. Just some cents of mine (unknown amount). I don't agree here. The names under /System/Index should be consistent with the ones under /Programs/App/Version. If we should use long names, then it should be /Programs/App/Version/Executables also, but that makes it harder to fit with existing software tarballs... Anyhow, I think the important selling point with gobo is the clever filesystem-is-package-manager layout, not the long names under /System/Links. =) God fortsättning på 2007! -- /Jonatan -=( http://kymatica.com )=- _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
