2007/1/10, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jonas Karlsson wrote: > > ...snip... > > > Having commented the patches, I also would like to comment the idea. I > > really like the idea and think it would be a great solution. However, > > I think we really would make a misstake if we abandomed our > > /System/Links/Executables, /System/Links/Libraries etc. I don't mean > > we should keep /System/Links, just that 'Executables' and 'Libraries' > > is much more clear than 'bin' and 'lib' (refer to, for example, change > > of 'Store' to 'PackedRecipes', which is a somewhat big change imo, but > > to ease readability). If we still would keep our long names, which > > actually is a selling point, I think we would reach almost an optimal > > solution. Just some cents of mine (unknown amount). > > I don't agree here. The names under /System/Index should be consistent > with the ones under /Programs/App/Version. > > If we should use long names, then it should be > /Programs/App/Version/Executables also, but that makes it harder to fit > with existing software tarballs... > I think you missunderstood me. I didn't say that we should use long names under /System/Index, just that I like the long names, and perhaps we can find a way to keep them.
> Anyhow, I think the important selling point with gobo is the clever > filesystem-is-package-manager layout, not the long names under > /System/Links. =) > Agreed that this is the main selling point, though long names is not a bad thing either, even though it is a bit further down the list. > God fortsättning på 2007! Detsamma! :) -- /Jonas _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
