Interface differences are often similar to discussions about calculator styles. Some swear by RPN, others swear at it :) I'd be happy enough with leaving the box up and maybe an hour-glass cursor. Just avoid visual silence as it tends to look like nothing is going on...
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:42 AM, <pragmatic...@gmail.com> wrote: > Drawing a box is exactly how earlier versions worked. I did this, first, > because other renderers did the same. I found drawing a box was not > intuitive at all. > > People just could not figure it out. > > The reason is that there is no conceptual mapping unless you have already > seen that behaviour in another program. > > What happens is, people do a very small click. This makes a tiny box and > they zoom into some tiny area and wonder what happened. > > So small click = ginormous change. > > My UI design has the property that small-click = small-change and > big-click = big-change. > > Now I can send it to people with no instructions! > > The problems you describe is that it requires a loading/aspect ratio > munging indicator i.e. > https://github.com/johnny-morrice/webdelbrot/issues/10 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
