I actually read through the thread and unless everyone in that thread got the same message then I Aram should not have gotten the note.
I recognize the potential value of the CoC but it always boils down to opinions. Imho this was a bad call. Bad calls happen and we should be able to get past it and move on. On Thu, Oct 27, 2016, 17:11 Nate Finch <nate.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > We should know what is a violation by reading the code of conduct. Making > the process public would make it a way to shame people, and also might > discourage people from reporting for fear of reprisal. The intent is to > inform people when they have said something that others find insulting or > unwelcoming, so that they may find nicer ways to express themselves. > > > On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 10:29:47 AM UTC-4, Jordan Krage wrote: > > At the very least, this kind of CoC 'enforcement' should be entirely > public and transparent. How are others supposed to learn what is > considered a violation, when violators are only contacted privately by > email? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
