1. Go's GC is quite predictable.
2. Go's runtime has no deallocation without GC for simplicity. You want to 
return complexity to runtime.
3. Why not use other language? Go is quite opinionated by its creators. Either 
you share that opinion, or use other language.
For example, D language can use both GC and ARC (with template-defined custom 
pointer types). It also has fibers (but with fixed stack). Vibe.d adds async 
networking with sync interface. I think, you will be able to implement channels 
and select. Go ahead.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to