On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 3:42:36 PM UTC+8, Sokolov Yura wrote: > > 1. Go's GC is quite predictable. > 2. Go's runtime has no deallocation without GC for simplicity. You want to > return complexity to runtime. > 3. Why not use other language? Go is quite opinionated by its creators. > Either you share that opinion, or use other language. > For example, D language can use both GC and ARC (with template-defined > custom pointer types). It also has fibers (but with fixed stack). Vibe.d > adds async networking with sync interface. I think, you will be able to > implement channels and select. Go ahead.
But it looks the go ecosystem is larger and more active. :( -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
