On Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 7:26:19 PM UTC+2, bingj...@gmail.com wrote: > > Almost 10 years golang appears in the world. 10 years is not a short > duration. I think if it is not popular until 2020, it will never be popular. >
I think it's already fairly popular. > I find one feather: they are both not just programming languages but also > platforms. They are almost the same in Windows and Linux. > So is Go. > Until now, programs written in golang still does not have binary > distribution format like jar, dll or so. People have to share libraries by > source code. It is so foolish. > Portable binary is totally overrated and unnecessary ***. I use windows 7, i program my Go server and test it on Windows, when i need to deploy it to Linux, i simply type "*set GOOS=linux *, *go build"* and i am done. Cross compilation is very easy in Go. As a computer user for 14 years and a programmer for 12 years, never in my life i enjoyed the benefits of portable executable. Only the simplest programs are truly portable and you have to install a huge framework to run just a simple tool you needed. They sell it like write for 16f84 and run on windows 10, but it's just marketing. I ported C codes written for android (such as dalvik/libdex) to windows and linux with minimal effort though. So in practice, source code portability is quite enough and Go is very portable. > Creators of golang are researchers, not engineers, they worked too slow. > That's just funny. ** I'm excited about the portable binaries that run in the browser like NaCl and WebAssembly though.* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.