On Friday, October 19, 2018 at 1:48:36 PM UTC-4, alanfo wrote: > > In the light of all the feedback there's been, I've put together a > proposal which sticks closely to the original design and only changes what > most people consider needs to be changed in some way. Some recent ideas > which seemed plausible but which I felt had little chance of adoption have > been rejected. >
Surface changes that don't tackle the fundamental unwieldiness and overcomplexity of the contracts extension. A good honest effort, Alan, but (with due respect to the people who put in cleverness and effort on the original overcomplication, I don't mean to insult them) this is lipstick on a pig. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
