I'm at a loss as to how that could be considered more readable that a
single ternary.
You've successfully changed five lines to four lines, but that's still a
long way from one line.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:15 PM Marcus Low <marcus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah of course I was joking... the solution I provided does work for the
> "I need a one-liner" mentality, though.
>
> I believe this following solution fits your use case, and is simpler to
> read too:
>
> datalen := removedKeyken // removedKeyken must have been int32 in your
> example.
> if value != nil {
> datalen = len(value)
> }
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:05 AM Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I’m pretty sure you’re joking... but I think most are referring to simple
>> usages, like this (from my own code). Clearly, there are others was of
>> designing it to avoid the usage, but sometimes what is simple really is
>> simpler.
>>
>> var datalen int32
>> if value == nil {
>> datalen = removedKeyken
>> } else {
>> datalen = len(value)
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2019, at 11:31 AM, Marcus Low <marcus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I personally do not find ternary operators to be readable in any form.
>> For those who are truly desperate for that cosmetic one-line kick,
>> though, here's an example you can use (which looks just about as unreadable
>> as any ternary operator out there):
>>
>> // ternary returns 12345 if x is positive (x > 0).
>> // It returns -1 otherwise.
>> func ternary(x int) int {
>> return map[bool]int{true:12345,false:-1}[x>0]
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 12:20:35 AM UTC+8, Robert Engels wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, but the FAQ has similar concerns about readability and
>>> maintainability as reasons for not having generics, but adds the language
>>> “may change”... not sure that is consistent with the views on the tenant
>>> operator.
>>>
>>> > On Apr 24, 2019, at 9:52 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <ia...@golang.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > The lack of the ?: operator in Go is a FAQ:
>>> > https://golang.org/doc/faq#Does_Go_have_a_ternary_form .
>>> >
>>> > Ian
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
