On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:38 PM Frederik Zipp <frederik.z...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The draft syntax for type lists is a comma separated list: > > type SignedInteger interface { > type int, int8, int16, int32, int64 > } > > Wouldn't it be more consistent with existing Go syntax regarding types if it > was a semicolon separated list in curly braces? I don't think so. The type list in this case is syntactically just an identifier list, i.e not a list containing possibly eg. type literals/anonymous types. And identifier lists are everywhere else comma separated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA40n-X2bFHTsKz7k1b3dspR_d_B5uPegEnxeEaDY5z5FB5Lfg%40mail.gmail.com.