On 26-12-2020, Christian Staffa wrote: > I would rather have a survey with generics specific question that would she= > d a better light to this topic. at least now, after following this discussi= > on. i also think that it could be good to add it but is it worth when it al= > so adds complexity? then i would say no thank you. go is powerful and simpl= > e but after that it would be powerful and complex. i think it would be bett= > er for go to solve the error handling. this would also make the go code bet= > ter readable which would help the language more than adding generics if it = > is a good solution, i think =F0=9F=92=AD=20
Maybe adding generics will help handling error ? -- wilk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/rs73mc%24m03%241%40ciao.gmane.io.
