On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:13 +0000, Jasper wrote:
> Now, as an afterthought, am I the only person to have missed the
> perlgolf history book, and the only person who submitted a score that
> didn't have something like : $;.=5x$_*8%29628
No. Look at \'anick for example (poor \'anick :)
I had once toyed with roman numbers for a local perlgolf, and remembered
that there were already some solutions out there, which I quickly found
via google.
I feel stupid for not realizing that the s/\w+/${$&}/ was optimizable.
But then, I only had half a day to spend on the golf.
Thanks for the game!
CU,
Sec
--
It is easy to be blinded to the essential uselessness of computers by
the sense of accomplishment you get from getting them to run at all.
-- Douglas Adams
