Hi Prashant, thanks for trying out the preview release! It looks like you're trying to persist a relationship, and as I pointed out in the note announcing the availability of this release, only simple types and embedded types are currently supported, not relationship. So, I'm not surprised to hear you're seeing this behavior. It was not my intention to give anyone the impression that what you are trying to do should work, so if I gave you that impression I apologize.
Max On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Prashant <antsh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Update: i test it on production server, child objects are not even getting > saved ! > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
