Thanks Toby, Can you point me to the threads you talk about?
Thanks, Luijar On Mar 2, 4:15 am, Toby <toby.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi luijar, > > I had the same problem -but no time-out- and I got some better > performance by removing all autowire and annotation-scan stuff and > also by putting lazy-init="true" on my beans. I even re-wrote a bean > by a regular Servlet, without any Spring and the startup performance > was as poor as with using spring. So I think the initialization > overhead is not that big.Depends a lot on your application, though. > > What is the worst is that even once an instance is started up, it > immediately seems to be suspended again. I think the cron-job is > probably not the best way to do it even though it seems the only > posibility for the moment. You will find a lot of threads on this > topic. > > Toby > > On Mar 2, 3:27 am, yjun hu <itswa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > i got the same problem too, there is no better way to resolve it, i just try > > to hitting a url with cron job. > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:50 AM, luijar <luis.j.aten...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the advice, I'll try that. > > > > On Mar 1, 2:31 pm, Rusty Wright <rwright.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Try using the old way with xml configuration for wiring your beans > > > together. The word on the street is that Spring's component scanning > > > takes > > > a lot of time. > > > > > luijar wrote: > > > > > Nope, I am still seeing it. It's quite frustrating. I even tried to > > > > > reduce Spring init time by removing schema validation from the > > > > > application context init. But, that does not seem to work. I am using > > > > > Spring annotations and component scanning to autowire my beans, I > > > > > wonder if using plain XML configuration will make autowiring faster. > > > > > > On Feb 23, 9:14 pm, charming30 <charmin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> Has the above mentioned "offline precompilatio" in 1.3.1 been able to > > > > >> solve your issue, I plan to use Spring on Java for my Business App > > > > >> which is complex and could be based on SOA. Kindly let me know if > > > > >> your > > > > >> issue was resolved or reduced by using the above fix. > > > > > >> On Feb 20, 12:05 am, luijar <luis.j.aten...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> I believe my development environment was on 1.3.0. That might be > > > > >>> something to look at, although it seems that probably it's a very > > > > >>> small overhead, do you have any metrics that would give some > > > > >>> evidence > > > > >>> as to how much overhead is "offline precompilation" adding? > > > > >>> Thanks > > > > >>> On Feb 18, 2:04 pm, Don Schwarz <schwa...@google.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> Have you deployed your application with the 1.3.1 SDK? That > > > > >>>> release > > > turned > > > > >>>> on "offline precompilation" by default, which is an optimization > > > that may > > > > >>>> help. > > > > >>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Alex <chasov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>>> Hi, > > > > >>>>> It appeared that long init problem is well known for Grails users: > > > > >>>>>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1736 > > > > >>>>> I wasted couple of weeks to create app I cannot run. Hope that > > > > >>>>> SpringSource and Google can solve the issue. > > > > >>>>> On Feb 17, 7:41 pm, Stephan Hartmann <hartm...@metamesh.de> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> The problem is that the initialization of your app takes longer > > > than 30 > > > > >>>>>> seconds. > > > > >>>>>> Pinging your app doesn't help when the app is restarted due to > > > > >>>>> redeployment > > > > >>>>>> or maintenance, or when high traffic demands a second instance. > > > > >>>>>> You should try to reduce your startup time. > > > > >>>>>> regards, > > > > >>>>>> Stephan > > > > >>>>>> 2010/2/17 luijar <luis.j.aten...@gmail.com> > > > > >>>>>>> Great, all of our projects areSpringenabled lol. But I guess > > > > >>>>>>> it's > > > > >>>>>>> good that we are not the only ones seeing this, hopefully it > > > > >>>>>>> gets > > > a > > > > >>>>>>> little more visibility. We have a cron job (1 min) that tries to > > > keep > > > > >>>>>>> our application alive by hitting a URL, but it does not do a > > > > >>>>>>> very > > > good > > > > >>>>>>> job. It's frustrating and we don't even have access to the 500 > > > page to > > > > >>>>>>> tell the user to retry or go somewhere else. > > > > >>>>>>> On Feb 17, 11:21 am, oth <other...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> Yes we have seen this problem a lot. Per our tests, an > > > application > > > > >>>>>>>> becomes idle after a minute of non activity. So, the > > > > >>>>>>>> unfortunate > > > > >>>>>>>> reality is that you need to keep your app alive by simulating > > > > >>>>> activity > > > > >>>>>>>> on it. Or go the nonSpringroute. > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks > > > > >>>>>>>> On Feb 16, 4:14 pm, luijar <luis.j.aten...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello Google App Engine forum, > > > > >>>>>>>>> We have been seeing ever since we deployed our applications > > > > >>>>>>>>> (currently 3 of them) that when our application instances > > > become > > > > >>>>> idle > > > > >>>>>>>>> (they have not been hit for x amount of seconds) subsequent > > > > >>>>> requests > > > > >>>>>>>>> return with a 500 response. Logs show a hard deadline exceeded > > > > >>>>> error > > > > >>>>>>>>> com.google.apphosting.runtime.HardDeadlineExceededError: This > > > > >>>>> request > > > > >>>>>>>>> (32306ebe63b71ab0) started at 2010/02/12 20:39:11.984 UTC and > > > was > > > > >>>>>>>>> still executing at 2010/02/12 20:39:41.225 UTC. > > > > >>>>>>>>> at > > > > com.google.appengine.runtime.Request.process-32306ebe63b71ab0(Request.java) > > > > >>>>>>>>> And the first line of the log message has the following : > > > > >>>>>>>>> 02-12 12:39PM 14.088 > > > > >>>>>>>>> javax.servlet.ServletContext log: InitializingSpringroot > > > > >>>>>>>>> WebApplicationContext > > > > >>>>>>>>> Question: > > > > >>>>>>>>> Has anyone else seen this behavior? How long does it take for > > > an > > > > >>>>>>>>> application instance to become idle? > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks > > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > > Google > > > > >>>>> Groups > > > > >>>>>>> "Google App Engine forJava" group. > > > > >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to > > > > >>>>>>> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. > > > > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >>>>>>> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2B > > > > >>>>>>> unsubscr...@googlegroups.com><google-appengine-java%2B > > > unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > > >>>>> <google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java > > > > >>>>> %252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > <google-appengine-java%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-ja > > > va%25252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > > > >>>>>>> . > > > > >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups > > > > >>>>> "Google App Engine forJava" group. > > > > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to > > > > >>>>> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. > > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >>>>> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2B > > > > >>>>> unsubscr...@googlegroups.com><google-appengine-java%2B > > > unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > > >>>>> . > > > > >>>>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > > 0x2B | ~0x2b -- Hamlet > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2B > > > unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. > > > -- > > dream or truth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
