Acually, I forgot about the fact that while a transaction is going on,
all entities involved are locked. Therefore, I considered changing my
database structure in order to get more, but smaller entity groups
(every parentEntity will have at most 20-30 childs). That way, will be
easier and faster to use transactions.

On 22 Ott, 19:54, "Ikai Lan (Google)" <ikai.l+gro...@google.com>
wrote:
> Cyrille is right: have an expectation of 1 transaction/second, though real
> world performance should be below this. App Engine favors a model of
> eventual consistency. You don't get to scale by locking a ton of entities at
> once.
>
> --
> Ikai Lan
> Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
> Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
> Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
> Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Cyrille Vincey <crll...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From my experience : I do NOT expect a better write performance than 1
> > transaction/second when creating entities inside one given entity group
> > (with 1 entity created in each transaction).
>
> > In your case : if dataset creation is an offline process, you can rely on
> > entity groups and parent/child data modelling, no matter how many child
> > entities you want to store. But you will have to expect high datastore
> > contention level.
>
> > My suggestion : in your data model design, only use parent/child design
> > when transactional features are REALLY required.
> > If transactional requirement are not so high, prefer to break your data
> > model into smaller entity groups.
>
> > On 21/10/10 17:00, "nicanor.babula" <nicanor.bab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >Thank you all for your responses.
> > >@alesj
> > >No, I am not confusing entity "group" with the actual entities stored
> > >in the datastore.
>
> > >@Ian Marshall
> > >Actually no, because I already did that kind of analysis.
>
> > >I have to use transactions in order to maintain data consistency and
> > >therefore I have to define the right entity groups. I already thought
> > >of a solution, just that I have read in the docs that is not
> > >recommended to put too many entities in an entity group. So: What is
> > >the number of child entities a parent entity can have, past which the
> > >datastore becomes slow? Hundreds? Thousands? Millions?
> > >I also understand that all entities in an entity group are stored on
> > >the same node of the datastore's distributed system and therefore I
> > >understand that if the number of entities an entity group has is too
> > >big, the queries will become slow, because will be processed by a
> > >single node. Right?
> > >Again: Which is that number?
>
> > >Thanks and sorry if I bored you with my long email. ;)
>
> > >On 21 Ott, 14:59, Ian Marshall <ianmarshall...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> How about my comments below?
>
> > >>http://www.google.com/url?url=http://groups.google.com/g/f907f736/t/f.
> > ..
>
> > >> Do they help you?
>
> > >> On Oct 20, 6:39 pm, "nicanor.babula" <nicanor.bab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > Hi everbody,
>
> > >> > I have a question regarding the datastore best-practices.
>
> > >> > The appengine's official documentation says that is not a good
> > >> > practice to put too many entities in the same entity group. What does
> > >> > "too many" mean in this case? Hundreds? Thousands? Milions?
>
> > >> > Thanks in advance,
> > >> > Cristian Babula.
>
> > >--
> > >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > >"Google App Engine for Java" group.
> > >To post to this group, send email to
> > >google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> > >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2 
> > >bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > >For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2B 
> > unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

Reply via email to