Sorry, I was referring to the $0.01/hr that Amazon charges for
reserving an IP address, thinking that a the proxy server was
essentially serving the same function.

On Aug 25, 8:27 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <nick.john...@google.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:53 PM, J <j.si...@earlystageit.com> wrote:
>
> > I have an idea, throwing it out to this group to see if it is sound.
>
> > What if there were a service in the cloud that served as an https
> > proxy?https://www.abc.comwould resolve to this service and its sole
> > job would be to be a proxy forhttps://abc.appspot.com. Well, there is
> > the performance problem of the extra hop, and the trust problem of
> > whether we trust this service to not look at messages as it terminates
> > the SSL certs at either end.
>
> Said service would have to have a unique IP per domain it proxies. This
> could be difficult to scale given the relative scarcity of IPv4 addresses
> these days.
>
> As you point out, it would also require routing all requests via a single
> location.
>
>
>
> > Are there any other problems that anyone can see? It might be a nice
> > short-term solution until Google comes up with their solution.
> > Amazon's $0.01/hr translates to $7.20 per month. What if this service
> > were priced similarly? How many folks would buy it? Does such a
> > service already exist?
>
> I believe Amazon's EC2 instances start at $0.10 per hour, not $0.01. You
> could serve many domains with one machine, potentially, but I'm not sure if
> Amazon will let you associate multiple elastic IPs with the same EC2
> instance.
>
> -Nick Johnson
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 24, 6:44 am, Kris Walker <kixxa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > repairman,
>
> > > I'm building what I hope will be a real business on GAE.  In
> > > particular, my system design is not possible in environments like EC2,
> > > because of the extra configuration and overhead involved in holding a
> > > static IP.  That was a design decision by Amazon.  Not having a static
> > > IP was a design decision by Google, and it offers a different set of
> > > advantages.
>
> > > If there were only a few different kinds of things on the planet that
> > > we could eat, we would have no chefs.  When creating a great dining
> > > experience for your customers you need a variety of ingredients to put
> > > together that 5 star dish.
>
> > > My hat is off to the GAE team for carefully considering their design
> > > implications.  I hope they continue to keep their ear to the crowd,
> > > but hold their ground to offer the ingredients we need to make great
> > > products, rather than just anything that everyone else has.
>
> --
> Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to