Actually, I just want to know how to avoid big entity group, is it possible or not. It obvious has some other parts need to be figured out, but I'm not really building a bank system, just concern about it.
2009/11/27 Niklas Rosencrantz <teknik...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:22 AM, 风笑雪 <kea...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If so, why google's engineers wast so much time for supporting the >> useless transaction system? >> No google guys would like tell me the reason? > For the future, tech team and investment banking very 2 systems you > know, one is more legislative (de jure) and technology more de facto. > Ask a technical physicists "can matter tunnel through..." answer yes. > Ask investment banker and answer is the opposite (normative) that your > vault is sealed. > >> >> I don't think only using app layer is a good choice, since I need >> connect the outside db by urlfetch which not efficient and safe >> enough. > It's most natural obvious very good choice avoid storage whenever you > can and just pass on. > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
