On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Gregory D'alesandre <gr...@google.com>wrote:
> Interesting idea. Could you use backends for non-urgent tasks? Then the > scheduler wouldn't need to be involved at all. > > I could use resident backends, but then I have to adjust the number of instances up and down as load fluctuates throughout the day. And if I use dynamic backends, then the scheduler will get involved, right? Also, it's not only for backend work; there are cases where you need to adjust priority per API. For example, I have user facing APIs that should be really fast. And I have other APIs that I use to sync data between GAE and my other servers. Those don't have to be fast, so I'd rather keep the cost lower. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
