It's M/S, but thanks for the quick answer. Very appreciated!

Cheers,
Per


On Sep 7, 6:25 pm, Jon McAlister <jon...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Per,
>
> I'm going to make a wild guess here and assume you are using the High
> Replication Datastore. Apps which have selected this are presently
> running on a set of machines that have the properties you describe.
> Rather than having idle instance processes evicted after some number
> of minutes, they hang around for hours. This is because of the present
> ratio of cpu to memory pressure on those machines; essentially, it's a
> by-product of the present supply and demand for that subset of apps
> and machines.
>
> It will certainly change but probably not for several months yet.
> Eventually it will have the same behavioral patterns as you see for
> M/S-D apps.
>
> If you'd like to keep one instance up always though, when the billing
> rollout is complete you'll be able to set min-idle-instances=1.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Per <per.fragem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I just disabled the "always on" option for my QA application, wanting
> > to experiment with the new pricing model. Instead, I set the max-idle
> > to 1, and I defined a 300ms latency in the application settings. The
> > QA box is rarely used, but since the Cron-Jobs keep running every 5
> > minutes to clean up stuff, there was always some base load.
>
> > I checked out the stats, and it turns out there was always one
> > instance up in the past 24 hours, and the currently active instance is
> > 11h old. That's perfect for me: the less instance restarts we have,
> > the faster the app will react (since startup takes some 5 to 10
> > seconds). Overall, this QA box cost me a mere 1ct under the new
> > pricing. Great news!
>
> > Is this too good to be true? When App Engine started out, new
> > instances got killed after 60seconds, and it was officially prohibited
> > to ping instances to keep it alive. Will that happen again? Or is it
> > fine to consume the free 1 instance permanently?
>
> > Cheers,
> > Per
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Google App Engine" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to