On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Joshua Smith <joshuaesm...@charter.net> wrote: > > You can read more about these issues here: > http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/01/16/debunking-the-dmca-caching-loophole/
That article strongly suggests that a proxy which rewrites URLs so that content is faithfully reproduced to the end-user would qualify. Just as Google Cache does. And let's be honest, a ton of "content" is rewritten in any transmission in the form of network packet headers, HTTP headers, etc. It should be plainly obvious that the issues here are not clearcut and there will be nothing gained by waiting for a political solution. Use the readily available technical solution or give up. Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
