Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 18:26:40 UTC+2 schrieb David Hardwick: > > Hello, > > I realize there's been a lot of discussion on startup times exceeded on > this forum recently, but wanted needed to post this experience we had this > morning to keep the attention on this important issue. > > We uploaded a point release of our app to a "not-live" version this > morning and, of course, we were going to click around on that instance to > make sure it's all kosher before making that version "live." The warm-up > requests for the "not-live" version were exceeding the deadline limit of > 60s... __and__we__are__on__F4s__!_!. > > However, the LIVE version of the app crashed too, 500 server errors, > instance counts went to zero, all sorts of whacky stuff was seen in the > control panel. All that happened to our LIVE version without when all we > did was upload another "non-live" version and hit it with a single > request...did I mention we were on F4s? ;-) Does the failure of any > instance to exceed the 60s limit take down all instances to include live > one? > > We did a few things as quickly as possible since our live application was > down, so clearly we didn't have the time to take the scientific approach of > only changing one thing at a time and wait to see if it that did it. > > We... > 1. Switched from F4s to F2 (i figured if this would least get us on some > new servers/instances) > 2. Increased max idle instances from 1 to 2 (with F4s running, I'm fine > with having just 1 idle instance and not at all happy about paying for 2 > idle instances, so maybe we'll just increase this prior to deployments and > then back down again after the deployment succeeds until we know more) > 3. Made the recently uploaded version live (hey, why not, the production > app was down for 10 minutes, so how much more harm could we do?) > > We use GWT and Guice, we jar everything (as I have been paying attention > to this startup time discussions for quite some time now. We are also > considering switching our Guice libraries to a non-AOP version as we saw > suggested in another blog since we just need the injection. > > Any insight, and I'm all ears! app_id=s~myflashpanel > > Regards, > -Hardwick > > -- > > *We make Google Apps even better.* > > *David Hardwick* > *CTO* > david.hardw...@bettercloud.com > > *Signature by Flashpanel <http://flashpanel.com/>* > *See us in Mashable: Growing Up Google: How Cloud Computing Is Changing > a Generation<http://mashable.com/2012/04/30/generation-growing-up-google/> > * > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/2M_6SmcBWdwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
