This is his evidence that higher-use apps have better performance. I'm not surprised that memcache hit rates would be higher (since you're more likely to evict your neighbors than vice versa) but the latency difference does surprise me.
I wonder if Google's balancing algorithms tend to starve low-qps apps? I can imagine a class of caching behavior that would cause that sort of thing, and the caches could be operating at many levels of the stack. - Kris On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 8:25:19 PM UTC-7, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > > Why are you posting memcache stats in a thread about backends? > > Jeff > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/UjQj9Ejj0gMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.