On Apr 24, 3:47 pm, "Howard, Stephen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you guys have a feel for the threshold # of polygons (and points per > polygon) that it's worth considering encoding vs. not encoding?
I'm not really sure that I do anymore. Back when I first started making these maps, it was literally impossible to make a polyline with more than 500 vertices that didn't crash most browsers. At that time, encoding allowed you to make polylines with tens of thousands of vertices. It seems, though, that things have improved greatly for normal polylines, though. I'm thinking that maybe you can do a few thousand points without worrying about encoding and still have reasonable performance these days. Mark --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
