Do you guys have a feel for the threshold # of polygons (and points per polygon) that it's worth considering encoding vs. not encoding?
Let's assume that data transfer isn't an issue, obviously it's always an issue, but I want to isolate that and consider the encoding/unencoding overhead. Assuming you pre-encode, you always have to unencode and I'm assuming there is overhead in unencoding? So for one or two simple polygons it would be more efficient not to encode? And if so, where is the threshold that makes unencoding worthwhile? Stephen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
