1: Ok.

2: No, not make my own project based on yours, help you to translate it. If
you turn it into C++ (which, if you can't do, I'll try to do) it'll be able
to run on Windows, Mac AND Linux.
I'd be having a look at the VB code, learn how the parts I'm not sure about
work and what their C++ equivalents are.
It's simply because of the fact that .net programs cannot be run on Mac or
Linux, where some Wave users are. You could TRY getting it to run on AIR,
but I'm not sure how that works :S
You may want to look at C++ For
Dummies<http://samosborneonline.co.cc/Downloads/C++_For_Dummies.pdf>

2009/10/15 Oliver Baker <ocba...@gmail.com>

> Hi Sam,
> *Answer to your First Question:*
>
> If you read the whole post you will know I have been given permission by
> Google to (For This Application only) Breach Condition L of  the Google Wave
> Program Policy until the relative API is released by Google.
>
> Which means that there is no current API for what I have done.
>
> *Answer to your second question.*
>
> I am assuming that you want to create your own project based on my source
> code???? Seems pretty harsh Sam.
>
> The Main part of my application that you probably want to obtain is the
> part which obtains the information. When the API comes out, my applications
> source to you that you currently want would be near pointless
>
> The source will be put up on Google Code soon (Within 2-3 days) since parts
> of it have to be re-written. I don't mind you using my source code. But I am
> trusting people not to pull a fast one on me.
>
> Hope that answers your questions.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver Baker
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Sam Osborne 
> <sam.tosbo...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> Ok.. I can interpret VB.net... Ish.. Now I want to know two things:
>>
>>    - How did you manage to get the APIs from whatever language they're in
>>    (Java/Python I think) to VB?
>>    - Where's the source? I wanna see if I can get the source, translate
>>    it into C++, and then get it to run in Linux..
>>
>>
>> 2009/10/15 Oliver Baker <ocba...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Hi Sam,
>>> The Application is made in Visual Basic .net 3.5 (Yes, I am only 17,
>>> still studying for a Bachelors and VB is easier than C# and obviously
>>> C/C++).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Sam Osborne <
>>> sam.tosbo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What language is it made in?
>>>>
>>>> 2009/10/15 Oliver Baker <ocba...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> I have good news!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Pamela has allowed me to continue developing and displaying my
>>>>> application using its current "Scrapping" method until the API comes out.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have put the Application back on Google Code and will shortly be
>>>>> releasing an update which fixes the Proxy Authentication issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Oliver Baker
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:38 AM, kim3er <rich...@dogma.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, I was a bit taken back by the use of the
>>>>>> word illegal for scraping websites. I suspect that we will start to
>>>>>> see the nature of scraping change in the near future as websites
>>>>>> become the API. Pages written in valid XHTML/HTML 5 with meaningful
>>>>>> naming conventions (like micro formats). I don't think scraping can be
>>>>>> a dirty word anymore. But I can understand the need for a company like
>>>>>> Google to control where and how the bandwidth is used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rich
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 14, 4:11 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <pamela...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > Sure, good point, let me clarify, though please keep in mind that
>>>>>> I'm not a
>>>>>> > lawyer...
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > According to the Google Wave terms of use, it is not permitted to
>>>>>> "modify,
>>>>>> > adapt, translate, or reverse engineer any portion of the Service
>>>>>> unless
>>>>>> > expressly authorized". In Oliver's prototype, he essentially reverse
>>>>>> > engineered the client display mechanism to extract the content. You
>>>>>> can read
>>>>>> > more of the policies at:
>>>>>> http://wave.google.com/help/wave/program_policies.html
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Once we have an API to let you programmatically extract the content
>>>>>> -- which
>>>>>> > is something we're working on -- then that API could be used to
>>>>>> build this
>>>>>> > prototype without having to reverse engineer. Another thing to
>>>>>> consider,
>>>>>> > more in the wave protocol effort, would be a client/server protocol
>>>>>> -- but
>>>>>> > things are early there at the moment.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > - pamela
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Joe Developer <
>>>>>> joe.d.develo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:42 AM, pamela (Google Employee) <
>>>>>> > > pamela...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >> Hey Oliver-
>>>>>> > >> I responded to you offline, but will also respond here to keep
>>>>>> the thread
>>>>>> > >> in the forum.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >> I assumed that was how you were doing this, but wanted to give
>>>>>> you a
>>>>>> > >> chance to explain. It is generally considered illegal to "scrape"
>>>>>> the HTML
>>>>>> > >> of webpages that do not grant explicit permission for that. That
>>>>>> is why
>>>>>> > >> webpages provide APIs- so that developers can legally use
>>>>>> content.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >> Really? Generally considered illegal? I would appreciate a link
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> > > documents such a finding. I would imagine that google search
>>>>>> results would
>>>>>> > > be fairly sparsely populated if they could only include those
>>>>>> pages that
>>>>>> > > include explicit permission for google to scrape.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > I would advise on waiting until we offer some sort of Google data
>>>>>> API to
>>>>>> > >> distribute a program like this.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >> - pamela
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Oliver Baker <ocba...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >>> How dare you Andrey!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >>> I do not store any of your information what so ever excluding
>>>>>> the last
>>>>>> > >>> Wave server you selected.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >>> Any Login information you enter is immediatly put into the
>>>>>> Google Wave
>>>>>> > >>> Login page to log the application into the Google Wave login
>>>>>> page.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >>> To enter your login details on Version 2 (Sorry I made this a
>>>>>> little
>>>>>> > >>> stupidly) you will need to left click on the Notify Icon or
>>>>>> right
>>>>>> > >>> click the icon, go into the Waves item, then click the login to
>>>>>> see
>>>>>> > >>> your waves button.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >>> Also, make sure you have Google Chrome Frame installed on your
>>>>>> > >>> computer for this to work. I am still working out the bugs.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >>> On Oct 14, 10:07 am, Andrey Fedorov <anfedo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > >>> > Uhoh, I hope you guys are at least running antivirus as you
>>>>>> run exe's
>>>>>> > >>> you
>>>>>> > >>> > downloaded online?
>>>>>> > >>> > - Andrey
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Scott Breakall <
>>>>>> break...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> > >>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >>> > > I've downloaded the exe, but am I missing something? There's
>>>>>> nowhere
>>>>>> > >>> > > for me to enter my wave credentials?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > >>> > > ~Scott~
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to